%PDF-1.5
%
1 0 obj
<<
/Metadata 2 0 R
/Names 3 0 R
/OpenAction 4 0 R
/Outlines 5 0 R
/PageMode /UseNone
/Pages 6 0 R
/Type /Catalog
/ViewerPreferences <<
/FitWindow true
>>
>>
endobj
7 0 obj
<<
/Author <4C696E65204C65647367616172642C2054696D6F74687920502E204A656E6B696E732C204B7269737469616E20446176696473656E2C204B616D696C6C6520456C76737472F86D204B72617573652C20416E64726561204D6172746F732D4573746562616E2C204D696B61656C20456E676D61726B2C204D696B61656C2052F87264616D20416E64657273656E2C204F6C65204C756E6420616E6420416E647265617320486F756761617264204C6175737473656E>
/CreationDate (D:20180927134217+08'00')
/Creator (LaTeX with hyperref package)
/Keywords (antivenom; cross-reactivity; cross-neutralization; high-density peptide microarray technology; antivenomics; snakebite envenoming; venom; toxins)
/ModDate (D:20181002095950+02'00')
/PTEX.Fullbanner (This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.18 \(TeX Live 2017/W32TeX\) kpathsea version 6.2.3)
/Producer (pdfTeX-1.40.18)
/Subject (Antivenom cross-reactivity has been investigated for decades to determine which antivenoms can be used to treat snakebite envenomings from different snake species. Traditionally, the methods used for analyzing cross-reactivity have been immunodiffusion, immunoblotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay \(ELISA\), enzymatic assays, and in vivo neutralization studies. In recent years, new methods for determination of cross-reactivity have emerged, including surface plasmon resonance, antivenomics, and high-density peptide microarray technology. Antivenomics involves a top-down assessment of the toxin-binding capacities of antivenoms, whereas high-density peptide microarray technology may be harnessed to provide in-depth knowledge on which toxin epitopes are recognized by antivenoms. This review provides an overview of both the classical and new methods used to investigate antivenom cross-reactivity, the advantages and disadvantages of each method, and examples of studies using the methods. A special focus is given to antivenomics and high-density peptide microarray technology as these high-throughput methods have recently been introduced in this field and may enable more detailed assessments of antivenom cross-reactivity.)
/Title (Antibody Cross-Reactivity in Antivenom Research)
/Trapped /False
>>
endobj
2 0 obj
<<
/Length 5475
/Subtype /XML
/Type /Metadata
>>
stream
application/pdf
Line Ledsgaard, Timothy P. Jenkins, Kristian Davidsen, Kamille Elvstrøm Krause, Andrea Martos-Esteban, Mikael Engmark, Mikael Rørdam Andersen, Ole Lund and Andreas Hougaard Laustsen
Antivenom cross-reactivity has been investigated for decades to determine which antivenoms can be used to treat snakebite envenomings from different snake species. Traditionally, the methods used for analyzing cross-reactivity have been immunodiffusion, immunoblotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), enzymatic assays, and in vivo neutralization studies. In recent years, new methods for determination of cross-reactivity have emerged, including surface plasmon resonance, antivenomics, and high-density peptide microarray technology. Antivenomics involves a top-down assessment of the toxin-binding capacities of antivenoms, whereas high-density peptide microarray technology may be harnessed to provide in-depth knowledge on which toxin epitopes are recognized by antivenoms. This review provides an overview of both the classical and new methods used to investigate antivenom cross-reactivity, the advantages and disadvantages of each method, and examples of studies using the methods. A special focus is given to antivenomics and high-density peptide microarray technology as these high-throughput methods have recently been introduced in this field and may enable more detailed assessments of antivenom cross-reactivity.
Antibody Cross-Reactivity in Antivenom Research
2018-09-27T13:42:17+08:00
LaTeX with hyperref package
2018-10-02T09:59:50+02:00
2018-10-02T09:59:50+02:00
antivenom; cross-reactivity; cross-neutralization; high-density peptide microarray technology; antivenomics; snakebite envenoming; venom; toxins
pdfTeX-1.40.18
False
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.18 (TeX Live 2017/W32TeX) kpathsea version 6.2.3
uuid:0b3385ad-557d-4099-b488-907ae7fa6e8b
uuid:dbbd3090-bc0a-4ca2-a611-122a6e1520c9
endstream
endobj
3 0 obj
<<
/Dests 8 0 R
>>
endobj
4 0 obj
<<
/D [9 0 R /FitH]
/S /GoTo
>>
endobj
5 0 obj
<<
/Count 14
/First 10 0 R
/Last 11 0 R
/Type /Outlines
>>
endobj
6 0 obj
<<
/Count 20
/Kids [12 0 R 13 0 R 14 0 R 15 0 R]
/Type /Pages
>>
endobj
8 0 obj
<<
/Kids [16 0 R 17 0 R 18 0 R 19 0 R]
/Limits [(Doc-Start) (subsection.3.7)]
>>
endobj
9 0 obj
<<
/Annots [20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R 23 0 R 24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R
30 0 R 31 0 R]
/Contents [32 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R 35 0 R 36 0 R 37 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R]
/CropBox [0 0 595.276 841.89]
/MediaBox [0 0 595.276 841.89]
/Parent 12 0 R
/Resources 40 0 R
/Rotate 0
/Type /Page
>>
endobj
10 0 obj
<<
/A 41 0 R
/Next 42 0 R
/Parent 5 0 R
/Title
>>
endobj
11 0 obj
<<
/A 43 0 R
/Parent 5 0 R
/Prev 44 0 R
/Title
>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<<
/Count 7
/Kids [45 0 R 9 0 R 46 0 R 47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R]
/Parent 6 0 R
/Type /Pages
>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<<
/Count 6
/Kids [51 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R 54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R]
/Parent 6 0 R
/Type /Pages
>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<<
/Count 6
/Kids [57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R]
/Parent 6 0 R
/Type /Pages
>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<<
/Count 1
/Kids [63 0 R]
/Parent 6 0 R
/Type /Pages
>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<<
/Kids [64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R]
/Limits [(Doc-Start) (cite.B39-toxins-349944)]
>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<<
/Kids [70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R]
/Limits [(cite.B4-toxins-349944) (cite.B71-toxins-349944)]
>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<<
/Kids [76 0 R 77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R 80 0 R 81 0 R]
/Limits [(cite.B72-toxins-349944) (page.11)]
>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<<
/Kids [82 0 R 83 0 R 84 0 R 85 0 R 86 0 R]
/Limits [(page.12) (subsection.3.7)]
>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/S /URI
/Type /Action
/URI (http://www.mdpi.com/journal/toxins)
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 1]
/H /I
/Rect [75.539 757.64 221.788 793.648]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
21 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/S /URI
/Type /Action
/URI (http://www.mdpi.com)
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 1]
/H /I
/Rect [474.736 757.64 519.737 793.648]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/S /URI
/Type /Action
/URI (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2979-5663)
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 1]
/H /I
/Rect [249.964 681.014 261.028 694.628]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/S /URI
/Type /Action
/URI (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3918-2425)
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 1]
/H /I
/Rect [284.644 667.505 295.707 681.119]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
24 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/S /URI
/Type /Action
/URI (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6918-5574)
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 1]
/H /I
/Rect [237.72 653.996 248.784 667.609]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/S /URI
/Type /Action
/URI (http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/10/10/393?type=check_update&version=1)
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 1]
/H /I
/Rect [466.564 515.116 518.801 534.117]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
26 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/D (cite.B1-toxins-349944)
/S /GoTo
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 0]
/H /I
/Rect [235.159 153.959 241.984 162.886]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/D (cite.B2-toxins-349944)
/S /GoTo
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 0]
/H /I
/Rect [509.045 126.941 515.869 135.867]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
28 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/D (cite.B3-toxins-349944)
/S /GoTo
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 0]
/H /I
/Rect [265.634 72.719 272.458 81.829]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
29 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/D (cite.B4-toxins-349944)
/S /GoTo
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 0]
/H /I
/Rect [272.849 72.903 279.673 81.829]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
30 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/S /URI
/Type /Action
/URI (http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins10100393)
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 1]
/H /I
/Rect [159.655 38.684 245.66 50.141]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
31 0 obj
<<
/A <<
/S /URI
/Type /Action
/URI (http://www.mdpi.com/journal/toxins)
>>
/Border [0 0 0]
/C [0 1 1]
/H /I
/Rect [404.434 38.684 519.737 50.141]
/Subtype /Link
/Type /Annot
>>
endobj
32 0 obj
<<
/Length 555
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
HTn0+xj6n<Э́X%_ʔlѤ083
5&34()Pl-ob1"HIL %4H&ѪH~$ 1|M[CXsAu<2z1@khrB2@R(P:C\}"#FR]3(V( 3lv?e!0;tREU{Rgiҥ|e;ΕUK8[^\Ga1($ޗ.Y[[HBX@^""@5G.&B|Q//sB֕_6SĆfLL;c3HjB&XkâM36agmҧNG{{E^A]woZo;7O`lioLba6nP11-q.yl~u[5iݳ$t\)O}庰f'&B~$GR^֏1u:=GÃ0rPpQunzoNG mnA
endstream
endobj
33 0 obj
<<
/Length 792
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
HTKs8ϯБI$@ˌcq=d10
R LF$8al1(O[~z%SA21
l6?Z#y q*@)<$d 0}6oZ^=hѓ^(%f" 2I~6hĢPqr<Șb`R21&8ŷ&hD̮j/9oG %owN&+;. $J)Nc"GtC%I(R@l_}")XM̓n!NMo{TMqp*KM^f5 lJt@i?